ICYMI: Day 2 Live Coverage from theCUBE at MWC26 in Barcelona
Summary
We’re revisiting Day 2 live coverage from theCUBE at MWC26 in Barcelona — four standouts that together map how telecom, edge, and enterprise software are rearranging around AI.
Transcript
**Kore**: We’re revisiting Day 2 live coverage from theCUBE at MWC26 in Barcelona — four standouts that together map how telecom, edge, and enterprise software are rearranging around AI.
**Achird**: First up: Databricks on how telcos should build AI with an outcomes-first mindset. The problem they framed was familiar — lots of fragmented operational and analytical data, and too many point solutions that don’t deliver measurable business results. The speaker proposed a three-layer approach: start by defining business outcomes, centralize operational/analytical/transactional data, then build apps and AI on top with strong governance. Let’s listen to that core explanation.
> ## Outcomes-First Telecom AI: Define Goals, Identify Data, Build Apps, Monitor Agents — Governance, Unity Catalog, Lineage, Traceability
> It's a three- level house. They need three levels. " So, I truly believe, and my friends often ask me this, I say, " Start with the outcomes. At least get started. Start with the outcomes. Know what you want to achieve. Then, understand the data that you need to achieve that outcome, and then create the application and the AI to get you there. " And working with a company like Databricks, because telco is so heavily- regulated, having that governance, full lineage, traceability, access control, because remember, you don't want anyone to access any data because you have 100 million subscribers, you've got a lot of data in there. So, those are the underlying principles, I would say, that you need. You need to know the data you have.
> You need to have trust in the data that you have, and you need to also monitor your AI agents. These are not things that you just let run off. So, you need to evaluate the monitor them because they are actually delivering 20 % growth in the telco, reducing churn by 40 % today. Now, imagine if you had 100 million subscribers and you're churning at 9% a year and you can reduce it by 40 %. It has a massive transformational impact on your P & L and you can get to those faults in your network way before. So, start with the outcomes, ensure you have the governance in your data, unify your data, own your data, and use both your operational data, analytical and your transactional.
> [John Furrier] >> They have the keys to the kingdom. They have the data
**Achird**: A crisp blueprint — the governance point landed hard: lineage, traceability, access controls, and continuous monitoring of AI agents. They even quoted impact estimates — roughly 20% revenue growth and 40% churn reduction potential — which turns the architecture conversation into one about measurable business levers.
**Kore**: That emphasis on measurable outcomes and ongoing monitoring really reframes AI from an experiment to an operational capability. Now, shifting from the core to the edge: how does AI change traffic flows and where compute needs to live?
**Achird**: Chris Lewis addressed that tension between exploding datacenter traffic and an access network that, so far, shows only a small AI footprint. He described edge node rollouts and the prospect of on-device models shifting patterns toward much heavier uplink usage — a potential industry inflection that could force telcos to rethink service models, pricing, and partnerships. Here’s his take.
> ## Uplink Surge and On‑Device AI: How Small Edge Nodes Challenge Data Center Traffic Dominance
> great. So, what is fascinating is that with all the moving parts of the, let's call it the AI world, the reliability, almost the conservatism of the telecom industry in some ways plays to its advantage, because connecting things... Let's break it down to the way things connect. Between data centers, that growth has been massive. And of course, luckily we've got the optics to do that. So, the capacity is there. We're pumping more capacity in. At the edge, and the edge is finally, I mean, after what, 10 years of talking about the edge. The edge is beginning. There ere some announcements this week, Telefónica here in Spain with Nokia starting to build some little edge nodes around the country to help deliver. But what's interesting is that the real edge, out to you and I as users or individuals in the business, so on, AI's not really impacted that traffic yet. It's about 1% of access traffic.
> So, we've not seen it go right out to the edge. And what we're seeing at this show with the announcements from people like Qualcomm in those edge devices, in devices which will have their own models running in the near- term, that may well change it. And if you talk to Ericsson, they're talking about the uplink becoming much more important. So, we're moving away from a predominantly downlink model to an uplink model. So, I think we have to be very careful not to confuse the explosion of traffic going on in data centers, between data centers and what's actually happening out on the access network, because of course, on the access network is where the telcos actually make most of their money. So, they're selling to you and I, they're selling to businesses, they're selling into the ecosystem and partnerships. So, that's not changing. The demand will change in traffic flows in the future. What we connect at the edge will change. And interestingly, during the judging of some of the GLOMOs this year, I came across the first robo guide dog, which obviously I'm interested in that for future years, whether that will help me get around the show or
**Achird**: That perspective makes the uplink a plausible new bottleneck — especially for consumer-facing services that start sending model updates and telemetry upstream. The implication is clear: network planning, QoS, and commercial models need to be proactively redesigned, not retrofitted.
**Kore**: Next, a product-level example of how vendors are adjusting: Juho Sarvikas on Inseego Subscribe and why the company is repositioning BSS as SaaS.
**Achird**: Juho unpacked Inseego Subscribe as a lifecycle platform that handles telecom expense, catalogs, rate plans, and even complex FED/SLED purchasing workflows — essentially everything short of the billing ledger. He highlighted carrier configurability and self-service portals as ways to lower acquisition and account management costs, plus a strategic move from partner-delivered projects toward a broader SaaS offering. Let’s hear him explain the product shift.
> ## Inseego Subscribe: BSS lifecycle subscriber management platform, SaaS expansion, FED/SLED focus
> [Juho Sarvikas] >> Excellent. I think we covered these two products maybe already and the mobile announcement we made, which really has reinvented the category. The other big announcement for us is a well- kept secret. So, we also have Inseego Subscribe. Now, forget what we just discussed. I'll bring it back together shortly. But for now, just forget what we discussed with the manageability and the devices. So, we have Inseego Subscribe, which is our BSS. It's a business support solutions. We have lifecycle subscriber management platform that the carriers can use. We effectively have everything in the platform, absent a biller. So, think about not only telecom expense management, but a much broader experience. We specialize in the FED / SLED public sector, where you have a lot of purchasing contractual items that you need to be able to manage, all of that complexity.
> And one of the key benefits from Inseego Subscribe is that we lower the cost of acquisition. But not only that, also the lifecycle cost of managing the account by providing tools where the customers can self- serve. So, let's say that you're managing a large enterprise in the US as a carrier sales rep. You can configure the catalog, configure the rate plans, you can serve the customer, but they can also enter the portal and self- serve.
> [Dave Vellante] >> So, you joke that it's a well- kept secret because it's been in market, right?
> [Juho Sarvikas] >> Yeah, that's a good point. We have a partner who has been out there well over a decade. And now, the new news is that we're making it more of a SaaS type of a play and expanding that to the broader audience. So, that's very exciting for us.
**Achird**: That shift to a SaaS BSS — and the focus on self-service for complex public-sector purchases — reduces friction for large buyers and lets vendors scale beyond bespoke integrations.
**Kore**: Finally, IBM’s macro view on core enterprise applications and why ecosystems matter more than ever.
**Achird**: Jason Kelley framed core stacks — ERP like SAP/Oracle, front-ends like Adobe and Salesforce, plus Workday and ServiceNow — as the backbone that must be stitched together. His argument: acquisitions create heterogeneous landscapes, and delivering AI-driven productivity at scale requires ecosystem partnerships and practical integration approaches. He also referenced “Client Zero” — IBM using its own tooling internally to validate value delivery. Here’s his summary.
> ## Core business applications: ERP, CRM, HR, ServiceNow, Adobe — IBM manages partner ecosystem
> [Jason Kelley] >> Core Business Applications, key word there is core. So think of those apps that are core to any of your given enterprises, there's always an ERP in the backbone. So you're going to have an SAP or an Oracle. There's going to be a front- end to that, an Adobe, a Salesforce. You're going to have capabilities of a Workday as well as a ServiceNow. And so those are the core business applications that my teams work with globally and continuing to see the business grow exponentially.
> [John Furrier] >> You guys have had great ecosystem relationships. The stock price is at all- time high. You guys are performing really well. The Client Zero stuff, all that productivity of AI, we heard that this morning in your booth. Talk about the ecosystem relationship to the company and why that's so important to the new IBM, I'll call it the new IBM, again, thundering away on the business performance. So, yeah-
> [Jason Kelley] >> We'll take the new IBM any day you want to say that, as long as the new means the continually growing and-
> [John Furrier] >> All- time high....
> [Jason Kelley] >> value to our clients. And I tell you that, that's where the thought of an ecosystem has really evolved. Our clients aren't ignoring the fact that they have multiple applications. Many of your large enterprise clients have grown over the years through acquisition. So they may have made a landscape decision at one point, but then as they acquire more, that landscape changes.
**Achird**: That “Client Zero” idea is important — it’s not just about building integrations on paper, it’s about proving they deliver day-one value inside your own operations before you sell them outward.
**Kore**: Quick recap — across these clips we heard consistent themes: start with outcomes; centralize and govern trusted data; expect the edge and on-device models to reshape traffic and commercial models; and embrace SaaS and partner ecosystems to stitch messy enterprise landscapes together.
**Achird**: If there’s one takeaway: telcos and vendors that align strategy, tight data governance, and partner ecosystems will capture AI’s real business value — while the rest risk creating complexity without trust or measurable impact.
**Kore**: Thanks for joining our ICYMI Day 2 roundup from theCUBE at MWC26. Stay curious — the network, the edge, and enterprise apps are all rewriting each other right now.
**Achird**: Until next time — keep listening, keep learning, and we’ll see you at the next show.
